Burns v. Riccardi

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burns v. Riccardi

356 So. 2d 1334, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 4, 1978

DocketNo. 77-363

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 356 So. 2d 1334 (Burns v. Riccardi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Riccardi, 356 So. 2d 1334, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

HENDRY, Judge.

Appellant, co-defendant and third party plaintiff below, appeals from an “order on defendant’s motion to consolidate.” Said order denied appellant’s motion to consolidate a third party claim previously severed by the trial judge.

[1335]*1335Pursuant to Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.270(a) and (b), the consolidation and severance of third party claims are within the sound judicial discretion of the trial judge. Brody Construction, Inc. v. Fabri-Buiit Structures, Inc., 322 So .2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Compañía Dominicana de Aviación v. Knapp, 251 So.2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971).

After carefully reviewing the record and briefs, it is our opinion that appellant has failed to demonstrate an abuse of the trial judge’s discretion. Accordingly, the order appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI