Burns v. Murray

203 N.W. 610, 163 Minn. 53, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1193
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 24, 1925
DocketNo. 24,089.
StatusPublished

This text of 203 N.W. 610 (Burns v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burns v. Murray, 203 N.W. 610, 163 Minn. 53, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1193 (Mich. 1925).

Opinion

Pur Ouriam.

This is a companion case to Burns v. Van Buskirk, supra, page 48. A recovery from appellants of $19,161, paid to professional baseball and hockey players, is sought. The complaint alleges that this sum was withdrawn from the city treasury and paid to the players by. direction of the city council, upon city orders signed by the mayor and clerk and paid by the treasurer. All concerned are charged with having known that their acts were illegal and. that actions brought on account of similar illegal expenditures were pending.

The case is ruled by Burns v. Van Buskirk, and the order overruling the demurrer to the complaint is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owosso Sugar Co. v. Drong
203 N.W. 610 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.W. 610, 163 Minn. 53, 1925 Minn. LEXIS 1193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-murray-minn-1925.