Burns v. Miranda

District Court, D. Alaska·Decided November 6, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00227·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA

SULTAN STEPHON BURNS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:20-cv-00227-JMK M. MIRANDA and ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING SERVICE AND RESPONSE Sultan Stephon Burns, a self-represented state prisoner, has filed a Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging retaliation for filing a grievance.1 As a prisoner litigant, Mr. Burns’s Complaint is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Complaint, liberally construed,2 appears to state

1 Docket 1. 2 See Hebbe v. Plier, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. 2010) (“[O]ur ‘obligation’ remains [after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)], ‘where the petitioner is pro se, particularly in civil rights cases, to construe the pleadings liberally and to afford the petitioner the benefit of any doubt.’”) (citation omitted). a plausible claim3 for the violation of Mr. Burns’s First Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution against Assistant Superintendent Miranda.4

Mr. Burns also names the Alaska Department of Corrections as a defendant. However, a State or a state agency is not a “person” under Section 1983.5 Therefore, the Alaska Department of Corrections is not a proper defendant and is terminated from this suit. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1343.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. The Alaska Department of Corrections is terminated as a defendant. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to change the caption of this suit to reflect M. Miranda as the only defendant, and the case is to be renamed Burns v. Miranda.

3. Mr. Burns is directed to use the updated caption on all future motions and filings.

3 See Cook v. Brewer, 637 F.3d 1002, 1006 (9th Cir. 2011) (“While the pleading standard for Rule 8(a) is liberal, the ‘[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’. . . In Iqbal, the Court noted that ‘[t]o survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to “state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”’”) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007), and Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (quoting Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570)). 4 See Docket 1. 5 Doe v. Lawrence Livermore Nat’l Lab., 131 F.3d 836, 839 (9th Cir. 1997) (“‘States or governmental entities that are considered ‘arms of the State’ for Eleventh Amendment purposes are ‘not persons’ under 1983.’”) (quoting Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 70 (1989)). 4. The Application to Waive Prepayment of the Filing Fee is GRANTED. A separate order shall issue regarding collection of the filing fee.

5. Mr. Burns’s Complaint was subject to screening and service must be effectuated in accordance with this order. Accordingly, the Motion for Entry of Default is DENIED AS PREMATURE. 6. Prior to docketing this order, the Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notice via CM/ECF to the State of Alaska, Civil Division, of all orders and

documents issued in this case. 7. The Clerk of Court shall immediately send a copy of this order and the Complaint to: Mandee Mlcek Assistant Attorney General Civil Division 1031 W. 4th Ave. Anchorage, Alaska 99501

8. On or before 21 days from the date of service of this order, the Attorney General for the State of Alaska or his designee shall file an appearance for each named Defendant that the Attorney General has decided to represent. 9. Each Defendant represented by the Attorney General for the State of Alaska shall have 60 days after the entry of appearances to file an Answer or otherwise respond. The Court will issue an additional order with service instructions for any Defendant that the Attorney General of the State of Alaska has not appeared for. 10. At all times, Mr. Burns shall keep the Court informed of any change of address. Such notice shall be titled “Notice of Change of Address.”6 The

Notice shall contain only information about the change of address, and its effective date. The Notice shall not include requests for any other relief. Failure to file the Notice may result in the dismissal of the action for failure to prosecute under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 11. After service of the Complaint, all future papers sent to the Court must be

identified with the name of the Court, the case number, the name of the Plaintiff and name of the first the Defendant, and the title of the document, as illustrated on the first page of this order.7 12. Mr. Burns shall serve a copy of all further filings submitted to the Court upon each Defendant or, if an appearance has been entered by counsel for

Defendant, on the Defendant’s attorney(s). Mr. Burns shall include, with any original paper filed with the Clerk of Court, a certificate stating the date that an exact copy of the document was mailed to the Defendant or her counsel. A Certificate of Service may be written in the following form at the end of the document:

6 See Local Civil Rule 11.1(b) (requiring a notice of change of address to be filed; “[s]elf- represented parties must keep the court and other parties advised of the party’s current address and telephone number.”). A Notice of Change of Address form, PS23, may be obtained from the Clerk of Court, if needed. 7 See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (“The title of the complaint must name all the parties; the title of other pleadings, after naming the first party on each side, may refer generally to other parties.”). I hereby certify that a copy of the above (name of document) was mailed, first class, U.S. mail, to (name of opposing party or counsel) at (address) on (date of delivery for mailing to correctional officer). (Signature)

Any paper received by a District Court Judge or Magistrate Judge which does not include a Certificate of Service indicating that each Defendant was served with a copy of that document will be disregarded by the Court. 13. Each litigant is responsible for keeping a copy of each document filed with the Court. When you send a document to the Court, you will receive a Notice of Electronic Filing (“NEF”) from the Court that will inform you of when that document was filed on the docket and the docket number of the document. Copies of documents that have been filed with the Court may be obtained from the Clerk’s Office for $0.50 per page. In the event of special circumstances or serious financial need, a party may file a motion asking for the cost of copies to be waived or reduced. 14. No party shall have any ex parte communication with a District Court Judge or Magistrate Judge of this Court about the merits of this action. This means that parties cannot communicate with any judge without the presence and/or knowledge and consent of the other parties. For example, Mr. Burns may not write letters to, or call, a judge directly. Any request for action by the Court during these proceedings must be filed with the Clerk of Court as a motion. 15.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. Miranda, (D. Alaska 2020).

Burns v. Miranda (Burns v. Miranda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
491 U.S. 58 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
550 U.S. 544 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
556 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Cook v. Brewer
637 F.3d 1002 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)