Burns v. Long

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burns v. Long

100 S.E. 38, 24 Ga. App. 167, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 470

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 7, 1919

Docket10199, 10200

StatusPublished

This text of 100 S.E. 38 (Burns v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Long, 100 S.E. 38, 24 Ga. App. 167, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

No error requiring the grant of a new trial was committed in any of the rulings on the rejection of evidence as complained of in the amendment to the motion for new trial, in grounds 1, 2, and 3; or in failing to instruct as complained of in ground 4; or in charging the jury as complained of in ground 5. On questions of fact the jurors are the final arbiters. The trial judge approved their finding in this case, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed, on main bill of emcep lions; eross-bill dismissed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., coneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

No error requiring the grant of a new trial was committed in any of the rulings on the rejection of evidence as complained of in the amendment to the motion for new trial, in grounds 1, 2, and 3; or in failing to instruct as complained of in ground 4; or in charging the jury as complained of in ground 5. On questions of fact the jurors are the final arbiters. The trial judge approved their finding in this case, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed, on main bill of emcep lions; eross-bill dismissed.

Broyles, P. J., and Stephens, J., coneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.E. 38, 24 Ga. App. 167, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-long-gactapp-1919.