Burns v. Lockhart
738 S.W.2d 423, 293 Ark. 514, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2390
Opinion
Petitioner has filed handwritten petitions to be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis and for a writ of habeas corpus. The petition to proceed as a pauper fails to comply with Rule 28 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus fails to state grounds which make a substantial showing that petitioner is entitled to relief. The petitions are, therefore, denied. See Glick v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 417, 706, S.W.2d 178 (1986) and Hayes v. Lockhart, 288 Ark. 419, 706 S.W.2d 179 (1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. Lockhart, 738 S.W.2d 423, 293 Ark. 514, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2390 (Ark. 1987).
738 S.W.2d 423 (Burns v. Lockhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Glick v. Lockhart
706 S.W.2d 178 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)
Hayes v. Lockhart
706 S.W.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)