Burns v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burns v. Lee

80 S.E. 676, 14 Ga. App. 244, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 194

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 20, 1914

Docket5321

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 80 S.E. 676 (Burns v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Lee, 80 S.E. 676, 14 Ga. App. 244, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 194 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

The evidence as set out in the answer of the magistrate was sufficient to authorize the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. It was not erroneous to refuse to reject testimony of the plaintiff and his clerk, that they had refreshed their recollection as to the correctness of the account hy examination of the books in which the account was charged, and, after having so refreshed their recollection, they would swear that the account was correct. Júdgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

The evidence as set out in the answer of the magistrate was sufficient to authorize the verdict in the plaintiff’s favor. It was not erroneous to refuse to reject testimony of the plaintiff and his clerk, that they had refreshed their recollection as to the correctness of the account hy examination of the books in which the account was charged, and, after having so refreshed their recollection, they would swear that the account was correct. Júdgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 S.E. 676, 14 Ga. App. 244, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-lee-gactapp-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack