Burns v. LaManna
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6357
CLINTON BURNS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN J. LAMANNA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:05-cv-03163-HMH)
Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton Burns, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Clinton Burns, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s orders accepting the report and recommendation of a
magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition
without prejudice and denying reconsideration of that order. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Burns v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03163-HMH
(D.S.C. Jan. 19, and Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. LaManna (Burns v. LaManna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.