Burns v. LaManna

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 20, 2006·No. 06-6357·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6357

CLINTON BURNS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN J. LAMANNA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (4:05-cv-03163-HMH)

Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clinton Burns, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Clinton Burns, a federal prisoner, appeals the district

court’s orders accepting the report and recommendation of a

magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

without prejudice and denying reconsideration of that order. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the

district court. See Burns v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03163-HMH

(D.S.C. Jan. 19, and Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. LaManna, (4th Cir. 2006).

Burns v. LaManna (Burns v. LaManna) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241