Burns v. Keohane Bros.
This text of 235 N.E.2d 51 (Burns v. Keohane Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Appellate Division denied the plaintiffs’ petition to establish a report on the ground that it “was not in proper form under Rule #30, of the Rules of the District Courts, in that it is not a petition to establish at all.” Thereafter the plaintiffs presented a “Motion to be Allowed to Amend his Petition [776]*776to Establish,” and the motion was denied. From this denial the plaintiffs appealed. Ño error of law has been shown. The allowance of the motion rested in the sound discretion of the court. Foster v. Shubert Holding Co. 316 Mass. 470, 477.
Order of Appellate Division affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 N.E.2d 51, 353 Mass. 775, 1968 Mass. LEXIS 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-keohane-bros-mass-1968.