Burns v. Keohane Bros.

235 N.E.2d 51, 353 Mass. 775, 1968 Mass. LEXIS 925
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 29, 1968·Published

Opinion

The Appellate Division denied the plaintiffs’ petition to establish a report on the ground that it “was not in proper form under Rule #30, of the Rules of the District Courts, in that it is not a petition to establish at all.” Thereafter the plaintiffs presented a “Motion to be Allowed to Amend his Petition [776]*776to Establish,” and the motion was denied. From this denial the plaintiffs appealed. Ño error of law has been shown. The allowance of the motion rested in the sound discretion of the court. Foster v. Shubert Holding Co. 316 Mass. 470, 477.

Herbert Lord for the plaintiffs. C. Leo Moriarty for the defendant.

Order of Appellate Division affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. Keohane Bros., 235 N.E.2d 51, 353 Mass. 775, 1968 Mass. LEXIS 925 (Mass. 1968).

235 N.E.2d 51 (Burns v. Keohane Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foster v. Shubert Holding Co.
55 N.E.2d 772 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1944)