Burns v. Hodgdon

California Supreme Court

Burns v. Hodgdon

28 P. 61, 64 Cal. 72, 12 P.C.L.J. 53, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 570

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 9, 1883

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 28 P. 61 (Burns v. Hodgdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Hodgdon, 28 P. 61, 64 Cal. 72, 12 P.C.L.J. 53, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 570 (Cal. 1883).

Pincite

Opinion

Ross, J.

This case comes up upon the judgment roll. The point made for the defendant is that the plaintiffs are concluded by the judgment rendered in a certain action entitled Hodgdon v. Griffin et al.

As conclusive against the defendant on this point, it is suffi[73]*73cient to refer to the sixth finding of the court below, which reads: “The right, title, and claim now set up by the plaintiffs herein are not the same which were tried and determined in said suit brought by said Hodgdon, but the plaintiffs here have title in fee to said premises, and a right to the possession thereof, which were not tried nor determined, nor within any of the issues involved in said suit brought by Wadsworth Hodgdon.”

Judgment affirmed.

McKinstby, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross, J.

This case comes up upon the judgment roll. The point made for the defendant is that the plaintiffs are concluded by the judgment rendered in a certain action entitled Hodgdon v. Griffin et al.

As conclusive against the defendant on this point, it is suffi[73]*73cient to refer to the sixth finding of the court below, which reads: “The right, title, and claim now set up by the plaintiffs herein are not the same which were tried and determined in said suit brought by said Hodgdon, but the plaintiffs here have title in fee to said premises, and a right to the possession thereof, which were not tried nor determined, nor within any of the issues involved in said suit brought by Wadsworth Hodgdon.”

Judgment affirmed.

McKinstby, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 P. 61, 64 Cal. 72, 12 P.C.L.J. 53, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-hodgdon-cal-1883.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack