Burns v. Heritage Patio Homes Ass'n

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burns v. Heritage Patio Homes Ass'n

829 S.W.2d 94, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 717, 1992 WL 82684

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 1992·No. No. 60458·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bums, et al., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for a declaratory judgment and grant of relief to Heritage Patio Homes Association, et al., based on respondents’ counterclaim. We affirm. In addition, we deny, without prejudice, respondents’ motion for attorney fees incurred in pursuing this appeal.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, putting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bums, et al., appeal from the trial court’s denial of their request for a declaratory judgment and grant of relief to Heritage Patio Homes Association, et al., based on respondents’ counterclaim. We affirm. In addition, we deny, without prejudice, respondents’ motion for attorney fees incurred in pursuing this appeal.

An extended opinion would have no prec-edential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, putting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment in accordance with Rule 84.16(b)(1).

Burns v. Heritage Patio Homes Ass'n, 829 S.W.2d 94, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 717, 1992 WL 82684 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 94 (Burns v. Heritage Patio Homes Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.