Burns v. Gardner
89 S.E.2d 424, 242 N.C. 731, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 674
Opinion
When this appeal was heard in this Court, two of its members, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., were not sitting. However, Devin, Emergency Justice, was sitting in lieu of Winborne, J. The six members of the Court being evenly divided in the opinion as to whether the ruling [732] of the court below should be sustained, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this action without being a precedent. Insurance Co. v. Stinson, 214 N.C. 97, 197 S.E. 751.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. Gardner, 89 S.E.2d 424, 242 N.C. 731, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 674 (N.C. 1955).
89 S.E.2d 424 (Burns v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hardware Mutual Fire Insurance v. Stinson
197 S.E. 751 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1938)