Burns v. Gardner
This text of 89 S.E.2d 424 (Burns v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When this appeal was heard in this Court, two of its members, Winborne and Higgins, JJ., were not sitting. However, Devin, Emergency Justice, was sitting in lieu of Winborne, J. The six members of the Court being evenly divided in the opinion as to whether the ruling [732]*732of the court below should be sustained, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed and stands as the decision in this action without being a precedent. Insurance Co. v. Stinson, 214 N.C. 97, 197 S.E. 751.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E.2d 424, 242 N.C. 731, 1955 N.C. LEXIS 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-gardner-nc-1955.