Burns v. Ettinger Security Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burns v. Ettinger Security Construction Co.

234 A.D. 887

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 887 (Burns v. Ettinger Security Construction Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Ettinger Security Construction Co., 234 A.D. 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the plaintiff made a prima facie ease which required the submission of the questions of fact to the jury. (See Hannon v. City of New York, 232 App. Div. 830; Bourg v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Id. 601; Anderson v. McNulty Brothers, 149 id. 735.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to the appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, the plaintiff made a prima facie ease which required the submission of the questions of fact to the jury. (See Hannon v. City of New York, 232 App. Div. 830; Bourg v. General Outdoor Advertising Co., Id. 601; Anderson v. McNulty Brothers, 149 id. 735.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-ettinger-security-construction-co-nyappdiv-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack