Burns v. Eckert

70 A. 1100, 74 N.J.L. 685, 45 Vroom 685, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 198
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 2, 1907
StatusPublished

This text of 70 A. 1100 (Burns v. Eckert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burns v. Eckert, 70 A. 1100, 74 N.J.L. 685, 45 Vroom 685, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1907).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reason given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 A. 1100, 74 N.J.L. 685, 45 Vroom 685, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-eckert-nj-1907.