Burns v. Eckert
70 A. 1100, 74 N.J.L. 685, 45 Vroom 685, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 198
Opinion
The judgment in this cause is affirmed, for the reason given in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Ti-ie Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 12.
For reversal — Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burns v. Eckert, 70 A. 1100, 74 N.J.L. 685, 45 Vroom 685, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1907).
70 A. 1100 (Burns v. Eckert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.