Burns v. Casale

276 A.D.2d 734, 715 N.Y.S.2d 158, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10932
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 30, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 276 A.D.2d 734 (Burns v. Casale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burns v. Casale, 276 A.D.2d 734, 715 N.Y.S.2d 158, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), entered August 10, 1999, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to vacate a prior order of the same court dismissing the complaint upon their failure to appear at a pretrial conference, and restored the action to the calendar.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A court may vacate an order entered on default upon a showing by the movant of a reasonable excuse and a meritorious [735]*735claim (see, Barbagallo v Nationwise Exterminating & Deodorizing, 260 AD2d 518; Grutman v Southgate at Bar Harbor Home Owners’ Assn., 207 AD2d 526). The plaintiffs’ default in appearing at a pretrial conference was due to reasonable law office failure (see, CPLR 2005; Parker v City of New York, 272 AD2d 310; Belesi v Gifford, 269 AD2d 552). The plaintiffs promptly moved to cure their default, and thus there was virtually no delay or prejudice to the defendants. Additionally, the plaintiffs demonstrated the merit of their claims. Thus, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to vacate the default in appearing at the conference (see, Mena v Choon-Ket Kong, 269 AD2d 575; Fox v Bicanic, 163 AD2d 272; Charmer Indus. v 71 Grand Liq. Corp., 128 AD2d 825). Sullivan, J. P., S. Miller, H. Miller and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bitzios v. Michelakis
89 A.D.3d 779 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Perez v. Han Ki Man
39 A.D.3d 521 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Genao v. New York City Housing Authority
32 A.D.3d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Adamo v. State
13 A.D.3d 472 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Katsnelson v. ELRAC, Inc.
304 A.D.2d 619 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Statewide Insurance v. Bradham
301 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Crystal Run Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Milnor Construction Corp.
301 A.D.2d 491 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Trumbull Insurance v. Henriquez
294 A.D.2d 369 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Lowe v. Steinman
284 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Melo v. Pagano
284 A.D.2d 436 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Astron Steel Fabrications, Inc. v. Kent Restoration, Inc.
283 A.D.2d 381 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Weitzenberg v. Nassau County Department of Recreation & Parks
282 A.D.2d 741 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 734, 715 N.Y.S.2d 158, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-casale-nyappdiv-2000.