Burns v. Burns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burns v. Burns

260 A.D. 1050, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6013

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 30, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D. 1050 (Burns v. Burns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Burns, 260 A.D. 1050, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6013 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order amending the final decree of divorce, modified as follows: By striking out the word “ weekend ” from the second decretal paragraph of the judgment, as amended (fol. 20), and substituting in place thereof the word “ Sunday.” By striking out the last sentence, lines 3 to 5 of folio 21. By striking out all of the said decretal paragraph following the words " Christmas vacations ” (fol. 22, line 6), and substituting in place thereof the following: “ each party shall have the custody of the children during half of each of the said vacation periods. That the defendant, Henry T. Burns, shall pay for the maintenance and support of the children, the school tuition, expenses of medical care, nursing and hospitalization of said children and all necessary clothing; and it is further.” As thus modified the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order amending the final decree of divorce, modified as follows: By striking out the word “ weekend ” from the second decretal paragraph of the judgment, as amended (fol. 20), and substituting in place thereof the word “ Sunday.” By striking out the last sentence, lines 3 to 5 of folio 21. By striking out all of the said decretal paragraph following the words " Christmas vacations ” (fol. 22, line 6), and substituting in place thereof the following: “ each party shall have the custody of the children during half of each of the said vacation periods. That the defendant, Henry T. Burns, shall pay for the maintenance and support of the children, the school tuition, expenses of medical care, nursing and hospitalization of said children and all necessary clothing; and it is further.” As thus modified the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D. 1050, 24 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-burns-nyappdiv-1940.