Burns v. Bibb Brokerage Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burns v. Bibb Brokerage Co.

155 S.E. 493, 42 Ga. App. 259, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 323

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 17, 1930

Docket20401; 20402; 20404

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 155 S.E. 493 (Burns v. Bibb Brokerage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Bibb Brokerage Co., 155 S.E. 493, 42 Ga. App. 259, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 323 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Stephens, J.

An entry upon a petition for certiorari which, under the ruling this day made in Flood v. Empire Investment Co., ante, 257 contains an acknowledgment of service of notice of the sanction of the writ, and which also contains a waiver of “all other” and “further service,” amounts not only to an acknowledgment of notice of the sanction of the writ, but also to a waiver of notice of the time and place of hearing. The acknowledgment and waiver having been made more than ten days before the sitting of the court to which the certiorari was returnable, as required in section 5190 of the Civil Code of 1910, the judge of the superior court erred in dismissing the certiorari in each case on the ground that the required notice had not been given.

Judgment i/n each case reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur. E. F. Goodrum, for plaintiff in error. L. U. Bloodworth, B. J. Fowler, Nottingham, & Nottingham, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

An entry upon a petition for certiorari which, under the ruling this day made in Flood v. Empire Investment Co., ante, 257 contains an acknowledgment of service of notice of the sanction of the writ, and which also contains a waiver of “all other” and “further service,” amounts not only to an acknowledgment of notice of the sanction of the writ, but also to a waiver of notice of the time and place of hearing. The acknowledgment and waiver having been made more than ten days before the sitting of the court to which the certiorari was returnable, as required in section 5190 of the Civil Code of 1910, the judge of the superior court erred in dismissing the certiorari in each case on the ground that the required notice had not been given.

Judgment i/n each case reversed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Bell, J., concur. E. F. Goodrum, for plaintiff in error. L. U. Bloodworth, B. J. Fowler, Nottingham, & Nottingham, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 493, 42 Ga. App. 259, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-bibb-brokerage-co-gactapp-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack