Burns v. Arrington

199 So. 2d 625, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1305
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 1967·No. No. 44474·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

GILLESPIE, Presiding Justice:

This is the second appearance of this suit in this Court. A former interlocutory appeal was dismissed because it was improvidently granted. Burns v. Arrington, 251 Miss. 247, 169 So.2d 831 (1964). Thereafter the case was tried on its merits, and the trial court held that the deed to appellant was given to secure money advanced to Pink Arrington for the purchase price of the land involved. Complainants below and appellees here are the heirs at law of Pink Arrington. After a careful consideration of the pleadings and proof, we are of the opinion that the chancellor was justified in finding that the deed was in fact a deed of trust given to secure the payment of funds advanced for the purchase price of the land. We find no reversible error. The decree should be and it is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

RODGERS, PATTERSON, SMITH and ROBERTSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burns v. Arrington, 199 So. 2d 625, 1967 Miss. LEXIS 1305 (Mich. 1967).

199 So. 2d 625 (Burns v. Arrington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fondren v. State
199 So. 2d 625 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1967)