Burns v. Arena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burns v. Arena

37 A.D.2d 577, 323 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 7, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 577 (Burns v. Arena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burns v. Arena, 37 A.D.2d 577, 323 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 8, 1971, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision denying their application for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements against respondents jointly, and general preference granted. In view of the uncontradicted claim of the seriousness and permanency of the female plaintiff’s alleged injuries, this case should have been granted a general preference. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Lathams and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, loss of services, etc., plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 8, 1971, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision denying their application for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements against respondents jointly, and general preference granted. In view of the uncontradicted claim of the seriousness and permanency of the female plaintiff’s alleged injuries, this case should have been granted a general preference. Rabin, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Lathams and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 577, 323 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burns-v-arena-nyappdiv-1971.