Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty.

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedDecember 24, 2015
Docket131 EM 2015
StatusPublished

This text of Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty. (Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty., (Pa. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

JUNIUS BURNO, : No. 131 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : LEHIGH COUNTY, : : Respondent :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are

DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid

representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings

to counsel of record.

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burno-j-v-ct-com-pl-lehigh-cty-pa-2015.