Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty.
This text of Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty. (Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
JUNIUS BURNO, : No. 131 EM 2015 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : LEHIGH COUNTY, : : Respondent :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 24th day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or Extraordinary Relief are
DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (explaining that hybrid
representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings
to counsel of record.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burno, J. v. Ct. Com. Pl., Lehigh Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burno-j-v-ct-com-pl-lehigh-cty-pa-2015.