Burnie McCall v. Magistrate J. Earl Cudd, United States District Court, District of Minnesota

544 F.2d 934
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided September 17, 1976·No. 76-8183·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Burnie McCall filed this original action requesting a writ of mandamus directing the United States Magistrate for the District of Minnesota, J. Earl Cudd, to add certain parties as party-defendants for the purpose of equitable discovery.

Upon the court’s own motion and pursuant to Rule 9(a) of this court the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied and the appeal is dismissed. In doing so, we note that this court is without jurisdiction to hear appeals made directly from the decision of United States Magistrates. See United States of America et al. v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnie McCall v. Magistrate J. Earl Cudd, United States District Court, District of Minnesota, 544 F.2d 934 (8th Cir. 1976).

544 F.2d 934 (Burnie McCall v. Magistrate J. Earl Cudd, United States District Court, District of Minnesota) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sick v. City of Buffalo
574 F.2d 689 (Second Circuit, 1978)
Joseph Sick v. City Of Buffalo
574 F.2d 689 (Second Circuit, 1978)