Burnie McCall v. Magistrate J. Earl Cudd, United States District Court, District of Minnesota
This text of 544 F.2d 934 (Burnie McCall v. Magistrate J. Earl Cudd, United States District Court, District of Minnesota) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Burnie McCall filed this original action requesting a writ of mandamus directing the United States Magistrate for the District of Minnesota, J. Earl Cudd, to add certain parties as party-defendants for the purpose of equitable discovery.
Upon the court’s own motion and pursuant to Rule 9(a) of this court the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied and the appeal is dismissed. In doing so, we note that this court is without jurisdiction to hear appeals made directly from the decision of United States Magistrates. See United States of America et al. v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678, and cases cited therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
544 F.2d 934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnie-mccall-v-magistrate-j-earl-cudd-united-states-district-court-ca8-1976.