Burnice Howard Dunn and Martha Lee Brown Dunn v. United States

288 F.2d 889, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4737
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1961·No. 18738·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

All the matters complained of by petitioner in this 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 proceeding are of the kind which may be reached only by appeal from the initial conviction. They are not reviewable under § 2255. Schmidt v. United States, 5 Cir., 1961, 286 F.2d 11; Aeby v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 267 F.2d 540; Moss v. United States, 5 Cir., 1959, 263 F.2d 615; Cawley v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 251 F.2d 461; McCreary v. United States, 5 Cir., 1957, 249 F.2d 433; Arthur v. United States, 5 Cir., 1956, 230 F.2d 666; Masi v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 223 F.2d 132; cf. United States v. Williamson, 5 Cir., 1958, 255 F.2d 512.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnice Howard Dunn and Martha Lee Brown Dunn v. United States, 288 F.2d 889, 1961 U.S. App. LEXIS 4737 (5th Cir. 1961).

288 F.2d 889 (Burnice Howard Dunn and Martha Lee Brown Dunn v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Paul Milo Van De Bogart, Jr. v. United States
305 F.2d 583 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)