Burnham & Van Shaick v. N. W. Ins.

36 Iowa 632

• Court: Supreme Court of Iowa
• Decided: June 19, 1873
• Status: Published

Opinion

Day, J.

-The allegation of the defendant Combs that the two mortgages executed by him were merely for the purpose of enabling the company to make such statements as would allow it to do business in other States, is not sustained by the proof. Combs became a member of the company in the latter part of 1866 or the fore part of 1867, and was president of the company from June, 1867, until within a few weeks of the appointment of the receiver, which occurred in June, 1868.

On the 14th day of October, 1867, Combs and wife executed to the company the two mortgages described, the conditions of which are the same except as to amounts. The conditions of the smaller mortgage are as follows : “ Provided, always, and these presents are upon this express condition, that, whereas, said Amos D. Combs has taken of the capital stock of the said N. W. Fire Insurance Company, the sum of four thousand dollars, and agrees to pay for the same the sum of four thousand dollars without interest, on or after ninety days from the date of this instrument, in current money or in capital stock certificates of the said North Western Fire Insurance Company. Now, if the said Amos D. Combs shall well and truly pay, or cause to be paid, the said sum of money or stock certificates above mentioned, and the interest thereon, according to the above rate of interest, then these presents to be null and void.”

The real estate and stock register of the company contains entries of mortgages received by the company, showing a total on hand, Dec. 31, 1867, of $61,108.80. This sum includes the two mortgages executed by Combs, together amounting to $18,000.

The evidence shows that thirty-six certificates of the capital stock of said company, of $500 each, amounting in all to $18,000, were torn from the stubs.

The stubs contain the number of the certificates, the number of shares, to whom issued, the date, and to whom transferred, and attached to each of the thirty-six stubs is a receipt as follows: “ Received this 19th day of Nov., 1867, A. D. Combs.”

The thirty-six stock certificates are alike, except as to number, and are as follows :

“ Shares $100 each. $500.”

“ The North Western Insurance Company, of Decorah, Iowa, for value, issues these shares of their capital stock in the sum of five hundred dollars, to Amos D. Combs, and the legal holder hereof shall share pro rata hereon, in the dividends to be declared in this company annually, on tbe second Monday in July in each year. Transferable on the books of this company, in accordance with its by-laws and charter.

“ In witness whereof the president and secretary have hereunto affixed their signatures and caused the corporate seal to be hereto attached, this 19th day of November, 1867.

“A. D. Combs, President.

“A. Z. Putnam, Secretary.”

The date of Combs’ receipt corresponds with the date of these certificates. By way of advertisement the company circulated cards of which the following is a copy: “ The North Western Fire Insurance Company of Decorah. This company has a chartered capital of $300,000, of which a large portion is paid up and held by over fifty different persons, comprising some of the wealthiest men in the west, and has over $70,000 invested in first mortgages on real estate, besides large accumulations. Although a young company, it has received in premiums the sum of $106,000, and paid losses amounting to over $30,000, Last year it paid ten per cent dividends to stockholders, thus showing it to be a safe and profitable investment, as well as a reliable institution. Out of six thousand policies issued, three-fourths are on farm property, thus making it what we desire it to be, a farmers’ company. By prompt payment of all losses, doing an honorable business and hard work, we intend to make the N. W. rank among the first insurance companies of the west.

“ A. D. Combs, President.

“A. Z. Putnam, Secretary.

“B. O. Dahly, Treasivrer.

“ W. A. S to well, Gen. Agent?

In. this statement the mortgages executed by Combs do duty in making up the aggregage of “ $70,000 invested in first mortgages on real estate.” The book-keeper of the company, under the direction of the officers, prepared a semi-annual statement of the condition of the company, which was filed with the clerk of the district court of Winneshiek county, and published in the Decorah Republican, March 6, 1868, showing the condition of the company on the 81st of December, 1867, to be as follows:

“Notes in hands of agents and on hand..........$22,079 20

Cash on hand and in hands of agents............. 7,128 29

Personal property............................. 1,200 00

Mortgages................................... 61,108 80

Real estate................................... 5,000 00

Interest tdue to date........................... 1,103 96

Total assets................$97,620 25

Total liabilities..............................$13,970 25”

Here again the Combs’ mortgages are pressed into service, for the book-keeper Stubbs, in answer to the question, “ What mortgages composed the item of $61,108.80, above mentioned ? ” states: “ One mortgage of A, D. Combs for $14,000 and another for $4,000, and other mortgages, the amounts of whieh I do not now remember.”

Prom the testimony of Combs it appears that all of the mortgages making up the sum of $61,108.80 were of the same kind, “provisional,” as he terms them, and not intended to be delivered unless sufficient was raised to make a statement in Minnesota. And yet, with the exception of his mortgage of $18,000, and one of Hays, who was a director of the company, for $10,000, they were all used in paying losses and securing borrowed money.

Briefly summed up the evidence shows the following facts : That in consideration of these mortgages, Combs received certificates of stock in the company for $18,000, upon which he was entitled to dividends and for which he executed his receipts. That these mortgages were included as a part of the available assets of the company, in the advertising circulars issued while Combs was president, and to which his name was attached. That they were included in the semi-annual statement of the company as part of its assets. That other mortgages executed in the same way and upon the same considerations were used in paying the losses and securing the debts of the company. These facts are entirely irreconcilable with the theory that the mortgages were not delivered to and did not become the property of the company. Indeed, whatever private arrangement may have existed between Combs and the company of which he was president, having obtained credit for the company by publicly representing these mortgages as part of the available assets of the company, and a very considerable part, he is now, as against creditors of the company, estopped from denying that these mortgages belonged to the company. He cannot be allowed to advertise an impecunious corporation into public confidence, and, after it has thus been enabled to declare a dividend of ten per cent upon a fictitious capital of $300,000, assert that his advertisement was false, and leave the policyholders who have paid the company, according to its own showing, $106,000 in premiums, without remedy for the $20,000 of losses sustained.

It appears from the evidence that during the time the company did business it received in premiums about $110,000, and that it sustained loans of about $50,000, of which it paid $30,000. The receiver was appointed in June, 1868. The principal property which came into his hands consists of premium notes, ranging in amount from $2.50 to $150, scattered through Iowa, Minnesota, Illinois and Kansas. Upon some of these the receiver has obtained judgment, but the cost of collecting has amounted to more than the sums collected, and they are regarded as worthless. The thirty-six certificates of stock issued to Combs have written across the face in red ink, without date, the word “ canceled.”

The stock certificate account is charged April 20,1868, with $28,300 surrendered to Hays & Combs, and the mortgage account of the same date shows that the mortgages executed by Combs for $18,000, and one executed by Hays for $10,470, are released. The evidence shows that the consideration for this release was the return of the stock issued to them, and for which the mortgages were given.

So that, briefly summed up, we have this case: The president and a principal stockholder of a fire insurance company issue their mortgages to the company for over $28,000 and receive certificates of stock for a like amount. These mortgages are carried into the advertising cards and into the statements of the company as forming part of its available assets. Having issued six thousand policies, received $106,000 in premiums, declared a dividend of ten per cent on a chartered capital of $300,000, the stock is returned to the company, the mortgages are surrendered and released, and the affairs of the company go into the hands of a receiver to whom is bequeathed a debt of $20,000, to be paid in worthless premium notes.

At the same time the directors generously assign to their president a note of $1,200, secured by deed on 240 acres of land and a mortgage on 120 more, $400 of the consideration of which note was cash and the balance for services. It would bring just reproach upon the law if such subterfuges could be rendered availing. It is true these mortgages provide that they are payable in current money, or in capital stock certificates of the said company. But the return of the very certificates for which the mortgages were issued is in no just sense, under the circumstances of this case, a payment. It is rather a rescission of the contract, and a placing of each party,in statu quo. Besides these mortgages were not recorded, and third persons had no means of knowing that they might be discharged in worthless stock of the company. They were carried into the statements of the company as valid subsisting securities, upon which they had a right to rely, and it would operate as a fraud upon policyholders to permit a construction to be placed upon and an effect to be given to these mortgages which would render them worthless. Whatever effect, therefore, may be given to the surrender of this stock as between the defendant Combs and the company, every principle of equity and fair dealing demands that as between Combs and the creditors of the company they be treated as still subsisting.

The policy of Burnham & Yan Shaick was issued on the 19th of September, 1861, and these mortgages of Combs were executed on the 14th of October, 1867. To the position that Burnham & Yan Shaick can have sustained no injury, whatever may be the condition of these mortgages and however discharged, because their policy, issued before these mortgages were made, could not have been procured on the faith of them, the answer is this: At the time this policy was procured the assets of the company consisted of guarantee notes. It is clearly deducible from the testimony that these mortgages took the place of the guarantee notes, for the statement made in March, 1868, of the condition of the company on the 31st day of December, 1867, makes no mention of guarantee notes as comprising any part of the assets of the company, whilst it does include as the principal part of such assets $61,108.80 of mortgages.

Further, the insured had a right to surrender the policy and to have returned to .them the unearned premium, and they probably would have done so if the cards issued by the company had shown that the guarantee notes had ceased to exist and that nothing supplied their place.

The objection that Burnham & Yan Shaick cannot prosecute this action for the discovery of property until they have first established their claim at law, is without force inasmuch as the suit is now prosecuted by the receiver for the benefit of all the creditors, and the evidence shows the debts of the company to be at least $20,000.

The court erred, therefore, in rendering judgment in favor of defendant Combs upon the claim for the mortgages mentioned in the petition.

II. It is urged that the court erred in requiring the receiver to pay to Combs $400 and interest, on the note of $1,200 held by him. Combs testifies that this $400 was cash paid by him. The facts respecting it are not clearly disclosed in the evidence, and we are not able satisfactorily to determine from the record that, as to this, the judgment should be disturbed.

The cause is reversed and remanded to the district court with direction to enter a decree ordering the delivery to the receiver for tbe use of tbe creditors of said insurance company, of tbe two mortgages executed by defendant Combs.

The plaintiff will have leave to amend his petition asking a foreclosure of the mortgages, if he shall be so advised.

Reversed.