Burnham v. Winsor

D. Massachusetts

Burnham v. Winsor

4 F. Cas. 784, 5 Law Rep. 507

CourtDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts

DecidedJanuary 15, 1843

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 4 F. Cas. 784 (Burnham v. Winsor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Massachusetts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burnham v. Winsor, 4 F. Cas. 784, 5 Law Rep. 507 (D. Mass. 1843).

Pincite

Opinion

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

sustained the positions of the counsel for the petitioner, remarking that he acquiesced in the decisions of Northey v. Field, and Nix v. Olive, above cited, which, although made at nisi prius, were made by able judges, and assented to by distinguished counsel, and cited with approbation by Lord Tenterden, in his Treatise on Shipping. He ordered a decree to be entered, that the sugars should be restored to Burnham, or his agent, upon his refunding the $4S3.00, giving up the draft for $1.700.00 to the assignee, and paying him the freight and charges.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SPRAGUE, District Judge,

sustained the positions of the counsel for the petitioner, remarking that he acquiesced in the decisions of Northey v. Field, and Nix v. Olive, above cited, which, although made at nisi prius, were made by able judges, and assented to by distinguished counsel, and cited with approbation by Lord Tenterden, in his Treatise on Shipping. He ordered a decree to be entered, that the sugars should be restored to Burnham, or his agent, upon his refunding the $4S3.00, giving up the draft for $1.700.00 to the assignee, and paying him the freight and charges.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 F. Cas. 784, 5 Law Rep. 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-v-winsor-mad-1843.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack