Burnham v. Whittier

5 N.H. 334
Superior Court of New Hampshire·Decided January 15, 1831·Published

Opinion

By the court.

It is well settled, that one of a firm may order the contents of a note made payable to the firm or order, to be paid to himself, and maintain an action upon it in his own name. 1 Caine’s Rep. 505, Kirby v. Cogswell; Chitty on Bills, 102, note ; Kyd on Bills, 106; 2 Peter’s S. C. R. 197; 16 Mass. Rep. 314, Russell v. Swan ; Bailey on Bills, 77.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnham v. Whittier, 5 N.H. 334 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1831).

5 N.H. 334 (Burnham v. Whittier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Russell v. Swan
16 Mass. 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1820)