Burnham v. Whittier
5 N.H. 334
This text of 5 N.H. 334 (Burnham v. Whittier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burnham v. Whittier, 5 N.H. 334 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1831).
Opinion
It is well settled, that one of a firm may order the contents of a note made payable to the firm or order, to be paid to himself, and maintain an action upon it in his own name. 1 Caine’s Rep. 505, Kirby v. Cogswell; Chitty on Bills, 102, note ; Kyd on Bills, 106; 2 Peter’s S. C. R. 197; 16 Mass. Rep. 314, Russell v. Swan ; Bailey on Bills, 77.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Russell v. Swan
16 Mass. 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1820)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
5 N.H. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-v-whittier-nhsuperct-1831.