Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford
5 N.H. 573
Opinion
The mistake in the writ is clearly amendable, and tile plaintiff has leave to amend his writ. 10 Mass. Rep. 203, Kincaid v. Howe; 5 ditto, 99, Bullard v. The Nantucket Bank; 11 ditto, 338, Sherman v. C. R. Bridge.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford, 5 N.H. 573 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1832).
5 N.H. 573 (Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lanfear v. Sumner
17 Mass. 109 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1821)