Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford

5 N.H. 573
CourtSuperior Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 15, 1832
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 N.H. 573 (Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnham v. Savings Bank for Strafford, 5 N.H. 573 (N.H. Super. Ct. 1832).

Opinion

By the court.

The mistake in the writ is clearly amendable, and tile plaintiff has leave to amend his writ. 10 Mass. Rep. 203, Kincaid v. Howe; 5 ditto, 99, Bullard v. The Nantucket Bank; 11 ditto, 338, Sherman v. C. R. Bridge.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lanfear v. Sumner
17 Mass. 109 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1821)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.H. 573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-v-savings-bank-for-strafford-nhsuperct-1832.