Burnham v. McGee Brothers Company

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedMay 9, 2011
DocketI.C. NO. 895044.
StatusPublished

This text of Burnham v. McGee Brothers Company (Burnham v. McGee Brothers Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnham v. McGee Brothers Company, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

***********
Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and considering the briefs and oral arguments of the parties, the Full Commission affirms, with modifications, the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner, and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD BEFORE FULL COMMISSION
Defendants' moved, pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-85 and Rule 701 of the Workers' Compensation Rules of the North Carolina Industrial Commission, for an Order allowing the re-opening *Page 2 of the record in this matter to include additional evidence in the form of a copy of Plaintiff's lease agreement for his current apartment residence, on the grounds that such documentation provides further evidence that the Deputy Commissioner utilized an incorrect method of determining the amount of Plaintiff's rent for which Defendants are responsible. Plaintiff indicated, both in writing and orally, that he did not object to Defendants' Motion. After consideration of the written and oral arguments of Defendants, the Full Commission GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Supplement Record before Full Commission. Accordingly, the copy of Plaintiff's lease agreement for his current apartment residence attached to Defendants' Motion shall be attached to the end of the exhibits.

***********
The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which the parties entered into at the hearing as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties were subject to and bound by the provisions of the North Carolina Workers' Compensation Act at all times relevant to these proceedings.

2. An employment relationship existed between the parties at all times relevant to these proceedings.

3. Defendant-Employer had workers' compensation insurance coverage with Defendant-Carrier at all times relevant to these proceedings.

4. Plaintiff's average weekly wage is $941.24.

5. The parties stipulated to the following documents being admitted into evidence as stipulated exhibits:

a. Stipulated Exhibit One: Pre-Trial Agreement;

*Page 3

b. Stipulated Exhibit Two: Plaintiff's medical records;

c. Stipulated Exhibit Three: North Carolina Industrial Commission forms and filings;

d. Stipulated Exhibit Four: Plaintiff's rehabilitation records;

e. Plaintiff's Exhibit One: Correspondence from Ms. Julie Robbins dated March 22, 2010 and accompanying documentation;

f. Plaintiff's Exhibit Two: Portions of "Residential Lease Agreement" between Plaintiff and Southwood Realty Co. d/b/a Mills Creek dated November 21, 2009;

g. Defendants' Exhibit One: Photographs of modifications done on the home of Mr. and Mrs. Brad and Patty Wright;

h. Defendants' Exhibit Two: Copy of check in the amount of $19,713.23 from Defendant-Employer to Toyota of Lake Norman dated June 24, 2008 and accompanying documentation.

***********
ISSUES
The issues to be determined are:

1. Whether Plaintiff is entitled to additional medical compensation in the form of assistance with the payment of rent for housing in a handicapped-accessible apartment with sufficient room for his medical appliances and supplies?

2. Whether Plaintiff is entitled to attorney's fees under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-88.1?

*********** *Page 4
Based upon the competent and credible evidence of record, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Plaintiff is 29 years old, with a date of birth of October 19, 1981. Although originally from Hazelton, Pennsylvania, Plaintiff has been living in the Charlotte, North Carolina area since July 2004. Plaintiff's family continues to reside in Hazelton, Pennsylvania. As of the date of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff was living in the Mill's Creek Apartments in Gastonia, North Carolina.

2. On April 3, 2008, Plaintiff was working for Defendant-Employer as a dump truck driver and as an assistant equipment operator on a project involving clearing a lot for a new home. Plaintiff drove a dump truck filled with logs from the land-clearing project to a saw mill. When Plaintiff released the straps securing the load of logs at the saw mill, a log rolled off and landed on him, causing severe injuries.

3. As a result of the injuries Plaintiff sustained, he became a paraplegic and is now paralyzed below the waist. Plaintiff underwent surgery and initially remained in the hospital due to his injuries from April 3, 2008 through April 14, 2008. Thereafter, Plaintiff was an inpatient in a rehabilitation facility until May 7, 2008.

4. Prior to Plaintiff's April 3, 2008 work injury, he shared a third-floor apartment that was only accessible by stairs with Mr. David Webb. The rent for this apartment was $829.00 per month, which Plaintiff and Mr. Webb split equally. Following Plaintiff's April 3, 2008 work injury, he was unable to return to the third-floor apartment that he shared with Mr. Webb because he could no longer climb the stairs to gain access to it. Instead, Plaintiff moved into a home owned by Mr. and Ms. Brad and Patty Wright, friends of Plaintiff's girlfriend at the *Page 5 time. Mr. Wright previously recovered from an injury similar to the one Plaintiff sustained, and the Wright family offered to help Plaintiff during his recovery.

5. At the Wright home, Mr. Don McGee, one of Defendant-Employer's owners, provided and paid for materials and a construction crew to modify the living room in order to accommodate Plaintiff's condition and to serve as his bedroom. The modifications included excavating and pouring a sidewalk that ran from the parking area to the rear of the Wright's home, cutting and installing two handicapped-accessible doorways, building a ramp, and re-fitting a bathroom. Defendant-Carrier did not pay for these modifications.

6. According to Plaintiff, living at the Wright's home made his transition away from inpatient rehabilitation more comfortable in that he received companionship, meals, physical assistance, and substantial psychological support. Plaintiff always intended his stay with the Wrights to be temporary. In October or November 2008, Plaintiff decided that it was time to leave the Wright home. By this time, Plaintiff had a sufficient level of confidence in his ability to be self-sufficient to live on his own.

7. Plaintiff located a handicapped-accessible, two-bedroom apartment at the Marquis apartment complex in Huntersville, North Carolina that rented for $779.00 per month. Once Plaintiff located the handicapped-accessible, two-bedroom apartment at the Marquis apartment complex, Ms. Sheila Faeth, Defendants' adjuster, requested that Ms. Jennifer Burton, a registered nurse and certified case manager, inspect the apartment to assure that it met Plaintiff's needs. At Ms. Burton's deposition, she stated, and the Full Commission finds as fact, that the apartment Plaintiff located at the Marquis apartment complex was suitable for his needs.

8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Derebery v. Pitt County Fire Marshall
347 S.E.2d 814 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1986)
Roper v. J. P. Stevens & Co.
308 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1983)
Timmons v. North Carolina Deparment of Transportation
473 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Burnham v. McGee Brothers Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-v-mcgee-brothers-company-ncworkcompcom-2011.