Burnham v. Brenna
This text of 86 A.D.3d 537 (Burnham v. Brenna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[538]*538The father moved to dismiss the mother’s motion pursuant to CPLR 2221 to renew her prior motion and for an award of an attorney’s fee. The Family Court properly denied the father’s motion, because a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 may be directed only against a cause of action or a defense, not a motion (see CPLR 3211 [a], [b]). Here, the proper response to the mother’s motion would have been to submit opposition papers (see CPLR 2214 [b]). Skelos, J.E, Balkin, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
86 A.D.3d 537, 926 N.Y.2d 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-v-brenna-nyappdiv-2011.