Burnham-Hanna-Munger Drygoods Co. v. Carter

113 S.W. 782, 52 Tex. Civ. App. 294, 1908 Tex. App. LEXIS 357
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 12, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 S.W. 782 (Burnham-Hanna-Munger Drygoods Co. v. Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnham-Hanna-Munger Drygoods Co. v. Carter, 113 S.W. 782, 52 Tex. Civ. App. 294, 1908 Tex. App. LEXIS 357 (Tex. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

HODGES, Associate Justice.

— This suit was instituted by the appellant to recover the sum of $407.88 due upon a promissory note signed by the appellee. The facts show that the consideration for the note was a previous debt due to the appellant from the husband of the appellee, and for the payment of which this note was given. The testimony also shows that the appellee at the time of the execution of the note was a married woman residing in Bowie County, Texas. We think under her plea and proof of coverture she is amply protected against any liability upon the note. There was no dispute as to those facts, and there can be no doubt as to the application of the law.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sandoval v. Eagle Pass Lumber Co.
248 S.W. 132 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1923)
Johnson v. Holland
204 S.W. 494 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.W. 782, 52 Tex. Civ. App. 294, 1908 Tex. App. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-hanna-munger-drygoods-co-v-carter-texapp-1908.