Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. v. Jacobs

66 Mo. App. 628, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 120
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 18, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 66 Mo. App. 628 (Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co. v. Jacobs, 66 Mo. App. 628, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 120 (Mo. Ct. App. 1896).

Opinion

Ellison, J.

The facts in this case are substantially like those in Swofford Brothers Dry Goods Company against these defendants, decided at this term, and practically the same briefs and arguments are submitted. We deem the case governed by the Swofford case.

It is true that a point is made in this ease that the court’s finding as to the dates of the purchases of the goods are in conflict with the allegations in the petition and affidavit. But that is a matter not affecting the merits of the controversy. It is not such a case as must depend on a certain date. If the fraud was committed, it can not affect the case that the allegation of the petition placed it at a date different from the proof.

We can see no cause for disturbing the judgment and must, therefore, order its affirmance.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. Moulton
80 N.W. 599 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1899)
Parker v. Zeisler
40 S.W. 881 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 Mo. App. 628, 1896 Mo. App. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnham-hanna-munger-co-v-jacobs-moctapp-1896.