Burnford v. Seghers' Syndics

5 Mart. 409
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 15, 1820
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 Mart. 409 (Burnford v. Seghers' Syndics) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnford v. Seghers' Syndics, 5 Mart. 409 (La. 1820).

Opinion

Martin. J.

delivered the opinion of the court. The petitioner instituted this suit, as one of the creditors of the insolvent, in order to set aside the proceedings of the meeting; of the creditors, 1 ; ® ** . ' on the ground that they were recorded in the ** . French language. The district court having accordingly set them aside, the syndics have brought the present appeal.

It appears to this court that the decision appealed from is perfectly correct. The proceedings of the meeting of the creditors, of an insolvent, are judicial proceedings. They are ordered by the court, and constitute a part of the proceedings in the suit, instituted- by the debtor against Ins creditors, and are the bas's on which rests the judgment which terminates it. They, therefore, are a part- of those written proceedings which are required to be promulgated, preserved and conducted in the language in which the constitution of thé United States is written. Const, art. 6, $ 15, 1, Martin’s Digestía.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and de-[410]*410that the judgment of the district court be 25 affirmed with costs.

ffennen for the plaintiff, Grymes for the tie* fendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Warner v. Stebbins
82 N.W. 457 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 Mart. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnford-v-seghers-syndics-la-1820.