Burney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Burney v. State

806 So. 2d 625, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2929, 2002 WL 181113

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 2002·No. No. 4D01-3982·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Burney challenges the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.800 motion wherein he argued that his 45 year sentence is illegal. We remand for resentenc-ing as the state agrees'that the 45 year sentence exceeds the 40 year maximum sentence permitted by statute for the offense of second degree murder. See Farmer v. State, 672 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Wright v. State, 600 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

. POLEN, C.J., TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Eugene Burney challenges the trial court’s denial of his rule 3.800 motion wherein he argued that his 45 year sentence is illegal. We remand for resentenc-ing as the state agrees'that the 45 year sentence exceeds the 40 year maximum sentence permitted by statute for the offense of second degree murder. See Farmer v. State, 672 So.2d 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Wright v. State, 600 So.2d 11 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

. POLEN, C.J., TAYLOR and MAY, JJ., concur.

Burney v. State, 806 So. 2d 625, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 2929, 2002 WL 181113 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

806 So. 2d 625 (Burney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related