Burney v. State

577 So. 2d 722, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3340, 1991 WL 53556
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 12, 1991·No. No. 90-00631·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant correctly contends that the trial court had no jurisdiction to hear the violation of probation proceeding after the expiration of the appellant’s original probationary term. Section 948.06, Florida Statutes (1987), provides the only means to extend probation, and “a probationer and his probation officer cannot make a valid agreement to extend probation in lieu of compliance with the statutory procedures.” Marsh v. State, 559 So.2d 411, 412 (Fla.2d DCA 1990). Thus, the judgment and sentence resulting from the revocation of probation are reversed and the appellant shall be discharged.

LEHAN, A.C.J., and FRANK and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burney v. State, 577 So. 2d 722, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 3340, 1991 WL 53556 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

577 So. 2d 722 (Burney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brunsvold v. State
864 P.2d 34 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1993)