Burney v. Hodgdon

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Burney v. Hodgdon

29 A. 493, 66 N.H. 338

CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire

DecidedJune 5, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 A. 493 (Burney v. Hodgdon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burney v. Hodgdon, 29 A. 493, 66 N.H. 338 (N.H. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The construction of the statutes, settled by general practice, is, that either of several forms of return, including the one made in this case, is evidence on which an action may be entered and continued for notice. The notice given by publication was legal. A demurrer to the plea in abatement should be sustained.

Case discharged.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

The construction of the statutes, settled by general practice, is, that either of several forms of return, including the one made in this case, is evidence on which an action may be entered and continued for notice. The notice given by publication was legal. A demurrer to the plea in abatement should be sustained.

Case discharged.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A. 493, 66 N.H. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burney-v-hodgdon-nh-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack