Burney v. Hodgdon

29 A. 493, 66 N.H. 338
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1890·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

The construction of the statutes, settled by general practice, is, that either of several forms of return, including the one made in this case, is evidence on which an action may be entered and continued for notice. The notice given by publication was legal. A demurrer to the plea in abatement should be sustained.

Case discharged.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burney v. Hodgdon, 29 A. 493, 66 N.H. 338 (N.H. 1890).

29 A. 493 (Burney v. Hodgdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Therrien v. Scammon
176 A. 116 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1935)
Rainford v. Newport
144 A. 70 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1928)
National Bank v. Mascoma Flannel Co.
46 A. 49 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1899)