Burney v. Collins
This text of 50 Ga. 90 (Burney v. Collins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
'Where service of the bill of exceptions is made by the attorney for the plaintiff in error, it must be authenticated by his affidavit made at the time of the service and attached to the bill of exceptions. (It.)
Bill of exceptions. Service. Practice in the Supreme Court. Before the Supreme Court. July Term, 1873.
When this case was called, counsel for defendant moved to dismiss the writ of error, for want of service of the bill of exceptions. The only evidence of service relied upon by counsel for plaintiff in error, was an entry signed by “F* [91]*91Chambers.” It was stated that F. Chambers was of counsel for plaintiff in error.
The motion was sustained and the writ of error dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
50 Ga. 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burney-v-collins-ga-1873.