Burnette v. Toebelman

196 So. 529, 1940 La. App. LEXIS 84
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided June 4, 1940·No. No. 17297.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*530 McCALEB, Judge.

A rehearing was granted in this case because we entertained some doubt as to whether the evidence submitted by the plaintiff was sufficient to maintain her contention that the board of the porch of defendant’s premises, which broke under her weight, was decayed, loose and insecurely fastened and that the defendant was guilty of fault in failing to maintain his premises in a safe condition.

A careful re-examination of the evidence submitted at the trial convinces us of the correctness of the result reached in our former decree.

For the reasons assigned, our original opinion and decree herein are reinstated as the final judgment of this court.

Original decree reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnette v. Toebelman, 196 So. 529, 1940 La. App. LEXIS 84 (La. Ct. App. 1940).

196 So. 529 (Burnette v. Toebelman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Joyner v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
240 So. 2d 545 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Mathews Furniture Co. v. La Bella
44 So. 2d 160 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1950)