Burnette v. Perry
This text of 559 S.E.2d 153 (Burnette v. Perry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Albert Perry petitioned the State Court of DeKalb County for a dispossessory warrant, alleging that Pattie Burnette had failed to pay rent due on certain leased premises. After a bench trial, the court ruled that Perry was entitled to a writ of possession and to $1,441 in unpaid rent.
Burnette appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by relying on “erroneous and untrue information.” She claims that she and Perry entered into a lease-purchase agreement for the property and that she had already paid Perry more than the amount due at the time Perry sought the dispossessory warrant. She seeks to occupy the property until the lease expires or the purchase is completed and seeks a return of all money erroneously collected by Perry.
We cannot consider Burnette’s claim because there is no transcript of the proceedings below and no attempt to recreate the record as provided for in OCGA § 5-6-41 (g) and (i). 1 Burnette, as the appellant, has the burden of showing error by the record. 2 When a transcript of the evidence is necessary, as it is here, and the appellant omits it from the record or fails to submit a statutorily authorized substitute, we must assume that the evidence supported the grant of a writ of possession and the award for unpaid rent. 3
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
559 S.E.2d 153, 253 Ga. App. 407, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 272, 2002 Ga. App. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnette-v-perry-gactapp-2002.