Burnett v. Witherell
This text of 24 La. Ann. 143 (Burnett v. Witherell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We see no error in this judgment. The intervenor claimed a privilege as furnisher of supplies to a plantation. The plaintiff claimed a privilege as lessor of the plantation. The judge a quo decided the contest in favor of plaintiff and rejected the demand of the intervenor for a concurrent privilege, on the ground, among others, that hiS privilege was not recorded in such way as to have effect against tho plaintiff.
We consider it settled that the plaintiff’s privilege, or more strictly, right of pledge, does not require to bo recorded, hut that the inter-venor’s does.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 La. Ann. 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-witherell-la-1872.