Burnett v. Vassar

Michigan Supreme Court

Burnett v. Vassar

712 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 1132

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided April 28, 2006·No. 129813·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

712 N.W.2d 465 (2006) 474 Mich. 1132

Andrew B. BURNETT, a minor by Jeffery R. BURNETT, Next Friend, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Matthew B. VASSAR and Shannon Mendoskin, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 129813(19). COA No. 264132.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of February 27, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

712 N.W.2d 465 (2006) 474 Mich. 1132

Andrew B. BURNETT, a minor by Jeffery R. BURNETT, Next Friend, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Matthew B. VASSAR and Shannon Mendoskin, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 129813(19). COA No. 264132.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

April 28, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of February 27, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Burnett v. Vassar, 712 N.W.2d 465, 474 Mich. 1132 (Mich. 2006).

Pincite

712 N.W.2d 465 (Burnett v. Vassar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Andrew B. BURNETT, a minor by Jeffery R. BURNETT, Next Friend, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Matthew B. VASSAR and Shannon Mendoskin, Defendants-Appellees.

Related

Andrew B. BURNETT, a minor by Jeffery R. BURNETT, Next Friend, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Matthew B. VASSAR and Shannon Mendoskin, Defendants-Appellees.