Burnett v. Superior Court of Marin County

573 F. Supp. 345, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13014
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedOctober 5, 1983
DocketC-82-4703 SAW
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 573 F. Supp. 345 (Burnett v. Superior Court of Marin County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. Superior Court of Marin County, 573 F. Supp. 345, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13014 (N.D. Cal. 1983).

Opinion

ORDER

WEIGEL, District Judge.

Petitioner Burnett requests this Court to issue a writ of mandate requiring the Superior Court of Marin County to act in conformity with what Burnett contends is that court’s policy of acting upon a writ of habeas corpus within 30 working days of the time a petition for such a writ is filed. Petitioner does not allege that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States; this Court is therefore without jurisdiction to entertain Burnett’s petition as a request for habeas corpus relief. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). Because the Superior Court of Marin County is not an officer, employee or agency of the United States, this Court also lacks jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to compel the state court to perform its alleged duty. See 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

As this Court is without jurisdiction, petitioner’s motion for a writ of mandate is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pankey v. Webster
816 F. Supp. 553 (W.D. Missouri, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
573 F. Supp. 345, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-superior-court-of-marin-county-cand-1983.