Burnett v. State

42 S.W.2d 1107, 119 Tex. Crim. 103, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 60
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 28, 1931·No. No. 14371·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction was under the provisions of Chapter 195, Acts Regular Session, 41st Legislature, which sought to amend article 602 P. C., 1925, making penal the act of deserting a wife or minor child; punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for six months.

The amended act referred to above has been held unconstitutional because of a defective caption. See Ex parte Heartsill, 118 Texas Crim. Rep., 157, 38 S. W. (2d) 803; Smith v. State, 118 Texas Crim. Rep., 92, 39 S. W. (2d) 53; McBrayer v. State, 118 Texas Crim. Rep., 90, 41 S. W., 245.

The prosecution proceeded in the District Court as if it were a felony. The defect in the caption of the art in question was called to the trial court’s attention in the motion for new trial.

[104]*104Under the authorities cited the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded, and it is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. State, 42 S.W.2d 1107, 119 Tex. Crim. 103, 1931 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 60 (Tex. 1931).

42 S.W.2d 1107 (Burnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McBrayer v. State
41 S.W.2d 245 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Smith v. State
39 S.W.2d 53 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)
Ex Parte Heartsill
38 S.W.2d 803 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1931)