Burnett v. State

46 So. 248, 92 Miss. 826
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 15, 1908
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 So. 248 (Burnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. State, 46 So. 248, 92 Miss. 826 (Mich. 1908).

Opinion

Oalhoon, J\,

delivered the opinion of the court.

It was error to refuse instructions Nos. 1 and 2 asked by the defense. Every person charged with murder is entitled to have the jury pass on whether the killing was done willfully, féloni[828]*828ously, and of his malice aforethought. On certain facts, the law sometimes presumes malice, but these facts must exist to supply the presumption, and the jury alone can determine the existence of these facts. The state may explain these, if it chooses, in counter charges, but the accused is none the less entitled to the ■instruction that malice aforethought must exist.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pruitt v. State
139 So. 861 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 So. 248, 92 Miss. 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-state-miss-1908.