Burnett v. State
This text of 150 N.E.2d 573 (Burnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a proceeding in which petitioner asks that this court mandate the appointment of counsel for petitioner in the lower court in which it is alleged he has -filed motion to vacate his judgment of conviction.
However, petitioner has not brought this mandamus’ proceeding in the name of the State of Indiana on relation of the party in interest,1 nor has he filed a certified copy of the records of the court below as required by our rules.2
The petition for mandamus is therefore fatally defective and is according denied.
Note.—Reported in 150 N. E. 2d 573.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 N.E.2d 573, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-state-ind-1958.