Burnett v. State

150 N.E.2d 573, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 286
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 1958·No. No. 0-513·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a proceeding in which petitioner asks that this court mandate the appointment of counsel for petitioner in the lower court in which it is alleged he has -filed motion to vacate his judgment of conviction.

However, petitioner has not brought this mandamus’ proceeding in the name of the State of Indiana on relation of the party in interest,1 nor has he filed a certified copy of the records of the court below as required by our rules.2

The petition for mandamus is therefore fatally defective and is according denied.

Note.—Reported in 150 N. E. 2d 573.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. State, 150 N.E.2d 573, 238 Ind. 702, 1958 Ind. LEXIS 286 (Ind. 1958).

150 N.E.2d 573 (Burnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Breedlove v. Barger
150 N.E.2d 573 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)