Burnett v. State

117 S.E. 764, 30 Ga. App. 261, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 382
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 15, 1923
Docket14342, 14343
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 117 S.E. 764 (Burnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. State, 117 S.E. 764, 30 Ga. App. 261, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 382 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The motions to dismiss the bills of exceptions are denied.

2. Under the particular facts of these cases the court did not err in dismissing the motions for a new trial. See Patterson v. State, 28 Ga. [262]*262App. 668; Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645; Reed v. Warnock, 146 Ga. 483. Judgment affirmed.

Decided May 15, 1923. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodicorth, J., coneut. ■J. T. Sislc, for plaintiff in error. A. S. Shelton, solicitor-general, George 0. Grogan, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adrian v. State
159 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 S.E. 764, 30 Ga. App. 261, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-state-gactapp-1923.