Burnett v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burnett v. State

117 S.E. 764, 30 Ga. App. 261, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 382

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 15, 1923·No. 14342, 14343·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The motions to dismiss the bills of exceptions are denied.

2. Under the particular facts of these cases the court did not err in dismissing the motions for a new trial. See Patterson v. State, 28 Ga. [262]*262App. 668; Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645; Reed v. Warnock, 146 Ga. 483. Judgment affirmed.

Decided May 15, 1923. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodicorth, J., coneut. ■J. T. Sislc, for plaintiff in error. A. S. Shelton, solicitor-general, George 0. Grogan, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

1. The motions to dismiss the bills of exceptions are denied.

2. Under the particular facts of these cases the court did not err in dismissing the motions for a new trial. See Patterson v. State, 28 Ga. [262]*262App. 668; Garraux v. Ross, 150 Ga. 645; Reed v. Warnock, 146 Ga. 483. Judgment affirmed.

Decided May 15, 1923. Broyles, O. J., and Bloodicorth, J., coneut. ■J. T. Sislc, for plaintiff in error. A. S. Shelton, solicitor-general, George 0. Grogan, contra.

Burnett v. State, 117 S.E. 764, 30 Ga. App. 261, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 382 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

117 S.E. 764 (Burnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

1. The motions to dismiss the bills of exceptions are denied.

Related