Burnett v. State

113 S.E. 245, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 42

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 25, 1922·No. 13711·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant’s conviction was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. II. Manry, Claude Christopher, for plaintiff in error. Herman 11. Johnson, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. State, 113 S.E. 245, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 42 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

113 S.E. 245 (Burnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.