Burnett v. State

113 S.E. 245, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 42
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 25, 1922
Docket13711
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 S.E. 245 (Burnett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. State, 113 S.E. 245, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 42 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The defendant’s conviction was not authorized by the evidence, and the court erred in overruling his motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. B. II. Manry, Claude Christopher, for plaintiff in error. Herman 11. Johnson, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adrian v. State
159 S.E. 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
State v. Flint
269 P. 476 (Utah Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 245, 29 Ga. App. 47, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-state-gactapp-1922.