Burnett v. State

627 So. 2d 1355, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189, 1993 WL 540165
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burnett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 644 So. 2d 152
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1993·No. No. 92-3057·Published

Opinion

THOMPSON, Judge.

Appellant Willie E. Burnett appeals the habitual offender sentence he received after he entered a plea to violation of probation. The state concedes that the sentence was imposed in error since the trial judge did not have the option to sentence Burnett as a habitual offender at the original sentencing. Snead v. State, 616 So.2d 964 (Fla.1993). We affirm the judgment, but we vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

At resentencing, the trial judge is required to “impose any sentence which it might have originally imposed before placing the probationer on probation or offender into community control.” § 948.06(1), Fla.Stat. (1989). The court also has the option of a one cell bump-up. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(14); Williams v. State, 594 So.2d 273 (Fla.1992).

Judgment AFFIRMED; sentence VACATED and REMANDED for resentencing.

HARRIS, C.J., and GRIFFIN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. State, 627 So. 2d 1355, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189, 1993 WL 540165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 1355 (Burnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snead v. State
616 So. 2d 964 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Williams v. State
594 So. 2d 273 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)