Burnett v. Smith

60 Ga. 314
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 15, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 60 Ga. 314 (Burnett v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. Smith, 60 Ga. 314 (Ga. 1878).

Opinion

Jackson, Judge.

This was a demurrer to an affidavit of illegality, which was sustained by the court, and the affidavit dismissed. The error assigned is the judgment dismissing this affidavit.

The affidavit made the point that the judgment on which the fi. fa. was issued was illegal, because the court had entered it up without the verdict of the jury — there being no issuable defense filed on oath- — -and that the suit being upon a sheriffs bond, the damages must be assessed by a pry-

This case is covered by the Piedmont and Arlington Life Ins. Co. vs. Lester, 55 Ga., 475. The sheriff’s bond was a contract, there was no defense on oath, the presumption is that the judge heard testimony as to the amount of damage, and awarded the right sum.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harris v. Black
85 S.E. 742 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1915)
Torrent v. Sulter
67 Ga. 32 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Ga. 314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-smith-ga-1878.