Burnett v. Motorists Mut. Ins.

872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1504
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 29, 2007·No. 2007-1176·Published

Opinion

Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0085, 2007-Ohio-1639. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed June 20, 2007:

“Whether former R.C. 3937.18(K)(2) when read in conjunction with R.C. 3937.18(J)(1) violates the [1505] Equal Protection Clauses of the Ohio and United States Constitutions since it creates an arbitrary and illogical classification based on household status that has a disparate and unfair effect since it precludes coverage for injured individuals who may not recover solely because they are related to and live in the household of the insured?”

The conflict case is Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co., 160 Ohio App.3d 663, 2005-Ohio-2025.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-0954, Burnett v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co., Trumbull App. No. 2006-T-0085, 2007-Ohio-1639.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. Motorists Mut. Ins., 872 N.E.2d 948, 114 Ohio St. 3d 1504 (Ohio 2007).

872 N.E.2d 948 (Burnett v. Motorists Mut. Ins.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnett v. Motorists Mutual Insurance Companies
875 N.E.2d 642 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Morris v. United Ohio Insurance
828 N.E.2d 653 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)