Burnett v. Johnston

157 S.E. 645, 172 Ga. 237, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 61
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 16, 1931
DocketNo. 7836
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 S.E. 645 (Burnett v. Johnston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. Johnston, 157 S.E. 645, 172 Ga. 237, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 61 (Ga. 1931).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. In the circumstances shown by the record in this case it was within the discretion of the judge to reinstate the case at the same term at which it ivas dismissed. In so doing his discretion was not abused.

2. No error requiring a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial is shown.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., who dissents, and Bede, P. J., absent for providential cause. W. I1. Terrell, for plaintiff in error. H. W. Chambers, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carolina Tree Service, Inc. v. Cartledge
99 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 S.E. 645, 172 Ga. 237, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-johnston-ga-1931.