Burnett v. Johnston

157 S.E. 645, 172 Ga. 237, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 61
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 16, 1931·No. No. 7836·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. In the circumstances shown by the record in this case it was within the discretion of the judge to reinstate the case at the same term at which it ivas dismissed. In so doing his discretion was not abused.

2. No error requiring a reversal of the judgment refusing a new trial is shown.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., who dissents, and Bede, P. J., absent for providential cause. W. I1. Terrell, for plaintiff in error. H. W. Chambers, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. Johnston, 157 S.E. 645, 172 Ga. 237, 1931 Ga. LEXIS 61 (Ga. 1931).

157 S.E. 645 (Burnett v. Johnston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carolina Tree Service, Inc. v. Cartledge
99 S.E.2d 705 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)