Burnett v. DeSoto County Jail
This text of Burnett v. DeSoto County Jail (Burnett v. DeSoto County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION
JOHN PAUL BURNETT PLAINTIFF
v. No. 3:19CV175-JMV
DESOTO COUNTY JAIL LT. CHAD WICKER SHERIFF BILL ROSCOE DESOTO COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEFENDANTS
ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS DESOTO COUNTY JAIL AND STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
This matter comes before the court on the pro se prisoner complaint of John Paul Burnett, who challenges the conditions of his confinement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, the court notes that the plaintiff was incarcerated when he filed this suit. The plaintiff has brought the instant case under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which provides a federal cause of action against “[e]very person” who under color of state authority causes the “deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.” 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants failed to provide him with his psychological medication during his stay at the DeSoto County Jail. For the reasons set forth below, defendants DeSoto County Jail and the State of Mississippi will be dismissed with prejudice from this suit. Detention Facility Not Amenable to Suit The DeSoto County Jail is not an entity subject to suit under Mississippi law. An entity’s capacity to be sued must be determined by reference to the law of the state in which the district court sits. Fed.R.Civ.P. 17(b). In Mississippi, “sheriff's departments are not political subdivisions within the meaning of the MTCA. Thus, the Sheriff's Department does not enjoy a separate legal existence, apart from [the county in which it is located].” Brown v. Thompson, 927 So.2d 733 (Miss. 2006). Similarly, Mississippi jails and prisons are not amenable to civil suit. Campbell v. Thompson, 2015 WL 5772535 (S.D. Miss.), Simmons v. Harrison County Sheriffs Dept., 2015 WL 4742381 (S.D. Miss.) For these reasons, the DeSoto County Jail will be dismissed with prejudice from this suit.
No State of Mississippi Policy at Issue The only way the State of Mississippi may be liable for the failure to provide the plaintiff with his medication is if the plaintiff alleges that a state policy caused that failure. For a plaintiff to state a valid claim under § 1983, he must “identify defendants … whose acts are causally connected to the constitutional violation alleged.” Woods v. Edwards, 51 F.3d 577, 583 (5th Cir. 1995) (citing Lozano v. Smith, 718 F.2d 756, 768 (5th Cir. 1983)). Mr. Burnett has not named a statute, policy, or practice by the State which caused the alleged denial of his medication. As such, the State of Mississippi will also be dismissed with prejudice from this suit. Conclusion
For the reasons set forth above, defendants DeSoto County Jail and the State of Mississippi are DISMISSED with prejudice from this suit.
SO ORDERED, this, the 6th day of January, 2020.
/s/ Jane M. Virden UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burnett v. DeSoto County Jail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-desoto-county-jail-msnd-2020.