Burnett v. Coffin
This text of 4 Ind. 218 (Burnett v. Coffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by Coffin against Burnett to recover from the latter the amount of damages alleged to have been done to the lands of the former by an overflow occasioned by a mill-dam erected by the latter. There was a jury trial of the issue raised by the plea of not guilty, and a verdict for the plaintiff for 1 cent in damages, and judgment for that amount, with full costs.
The defendant below brings the’case to this Court and assigns for error the giving of full costs to the plaintiff.
In actions ex delicto, under the code of 1843, where the title to real estate comes in question, the plaintiff recovers full costs, when successful, even though he do not recover 5 dollars in damages. R. S. 1843, p. 735,
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
The R. S. 1852 contain a similar provision. Sec. 398, of vol. 2, p. 127, enacts that, “ In all actions for damages solely, not arising out of contract, if the plaintiff do not recover five dollars damages, he shall recover no more costs than damages, except in actions for injuries to character and false imprisonment, and where the title to real estate comes in question.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Ind. 218, 1853 Ind. LEXIS 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-coffin-ind-1853.